Wow ,you look exact like me .How could it be possible? As I
know I have no twins however I’m so perplexed to see you like I’m seeing my
image on the mirror. I’m cloned of you by the scientist since you are so busy
until you can’t manage doing two things at the same time as you can’t split
into two. As we know , have naturally occur cloning which are the identical
twins are produced. However in fast growing technology it could be done through
CLONING. So what is the meaning of
cloning? Cloning’ typically refers to somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT).
SCNT involves transferring the nucleus of a somatic cell (any body cell other
than a sperm or egg cell) into an enucleated oocyte. This simply means an
oocyte from which the nucleus and thus most of the DNA has been removed. The
oocyte is treated with electric current to stimulate cell division and an
embryo is formed. The extracted DNA is inserted into womb o surrogate mother.
This was proven as the first mammal Dooly the sheep was cloned using somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). However human
cloning has been the main topic of the cloning debate., so human cloning should
be allowed? In my opinion human cloning should be allowed since the pros of
cloning outweigh the cons.
In my point of view cloning actually helps in organ
replacement. I’m sure there are many of us are suffering in diabetes. The treatment of course
undergoing dialysis process at least
three times a week. It could be painful
to be poked all over on your body with
big needles. However the situation can be handled since the vital organs can be
cloned too. They can serve as backup system for human beings. Cloning body
parts serve as a life saver. For instance the body organ such as kidney
or heart. There’s no need for us to wait for long period of time to
transplant a kidney since a cloned of your kidney from
your own stem cell can be replaced. This method has higher chance to
your body to accept the organ compared an organ donated by the donors which has
possibly high risk of rejecting it.
Next, cloning is expansion of opportunities for
reproduction. Human reproductive cloning could offer a new means for
prospective parents to satisfy their reproductive desires. It is most often
presented as a possible treatment for infertility. For those unable to produce
embryos of their own, cloning opens up the possibility of using donated eggs
(or the woman's own eggs if she is able to produce viable eggs) and then using
a somatic cell nucleus of the mother or that of her partner to create a child
closely genetically related to one of them. If the female partner's egg is used
to clone the genome of her male partner, the resulting child would be
genetically related to both parents since the egg contains the mother's
mitochondrial DNA. Further, and in particular, cloning could be used to provide
homosexual couples with genetically related children.By cloning the genome of a
healthy person, parents may avoid passing on inheritable diseases to their
child. People might also choose to give their child the genome of a person with
good health and other desirable characteristics in order to provide the child
with a wide array of possible life plans. Another possible use of reproductive
cloning is to help create a child that is a tissue match for a sick sibling.
The stem cells from the umbilical cord blood or from the bone marrow of the
cloned child could be used to cure the diseased child. Such children, referred
to as ‘saviour siblings’, have already been created through sexual reproduction
or, more efficiently, through a combination of IVF.
Besides , Cloning of stem cells will provide treatments for
variety diseases. Because stem cells can turn into many other cell types with
the right prompting, doctors may be able to replace tissues and organs damaged
by disease or injury to restore healthy function. If therapeutic cloning is
practiced, the fertilized egg cell is harvested. When the cell has itself a few
times divided, the valuable embryonic stem cells can be taken from the
developing embryo, hereby the embryo is killed.
One issue concerns the use of animal organs for transplantation to human beings, such as using the heart valve of a pig to replace a human heart valve. This kind of transplantation is called a xenotransplant. First addressed by Pope Pius XII in 1956, the Church maintains that such transplants are morally acceptable on three conditions: (1) the transplanted organ does not impair the integrity of the genetic or psychological identity of the recipient, (2) the transplant has a proven biological record of possible success, and (3) the transplant does not involve inordinate risk for the recipient. A second issue concerns the use of organs or tissues from aborted children (such as those murdered through partial birth abortion procedures). Actually a lucrative organ “Harvesting” industry is developing which utilizes the organs and tissues of aborted fetuses. A critical point here is that these abortions are performed with the intention of utilizing the organs or tissues of the infant, and in direct conjunction with a particular recipient in mind. Another facet of this issue is when a child is conceived naturally or through in vitro fertilization to obtain the best genetic match, and then born or even aborted simply for organs or tissues. For example, recently a couple conceived a child for the sole purpose of being a bone marrow donor for another sibling suffering from leukemia; while the conceived child determined to be a good match while still in the womb and was born, one must wonder if the child would have been aborted if he had not been a good match. To participate in an abortion to obtain organs, to conceive a child for organs, or to knowingly use organs from aborted fetuses is morally wrong. This issue has even become more complicated with the technological research in cloning. Some researchers hope to grow tissue and even organs from stem cells retrieved from human embryos; however, to do so necessitates the destruction of the embryo. Since human life begins at conception and is sacred from that very moment, such destruction is immoral.
One issue concerns the use of animal organs for transplantation to human beings, such as using the heart valve of a pig to replace a human heart valve. This kind of transplantation is called a xenotransplant. First addressed by Pope Pius XII in 1956, the Church maintains that such transplants are morally acceptable on three conditions: (1) the transplanted organ does not impair the integrity of the genetic or psychological identity of the recipient, (2) the transplant has a proven biological record of possible success, and (3) the transplant does not involve inordinate risk for the recipient. A second issue concerns the use of organs or tissues from aborted children (such as those murdered through partial birth abortion procedures). Actually a lucrative organ “Harvesting” industry is developing which utilizes the organs and tissues of aborted fetuses. A critical point here is that these abortions are performed with the intention of utilizing the organs or tissues of the infant, and in direct conjunction with a particular recipient in mind. Another facet of this issue is when a child is conceived naturally or through in vitro fertilization to obtain the best genetic match, and then born or even aborted simply for organs or tissues. For example, recently a couple conceived a child for the sole purpose of being a bone marrow donor for another sibling suffering from leukemia; while the conceived child determined to be a good match while still in the womb and was born, one must wonder if the child would have been aborted if he had not been a good match. To participate in an abortion to obtain organs, to conceive a child for organs, or to knowingly use organs from aborted fetuses is morally wrong. This issue has even become more complicated with the technological research in cloning. Some researchers hope to grow tissue and even organs from stem cells retrieved from human embryos; however, to do so necessitates the destruction of the embryo. Since human life begins at conception and is sacred from that very moment, such destruction is immoral.
The purpose of therapeutic cloning is to clone things such
as organs and tissue for patients in need. Therapeutic applications of stem
cells potentially could treat illnesses including: Parkinson’s disease,
diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, stroke, heart attack, multiple sclerosis, blood,
bone and bone marrow ailments, severe burns by providing skin grafts, spinal
cord injuries, and cancer patients who have lost cells and tissue to radiation
and chemotherapy. In addition, stem cells could be harnessed and packaged to
deliver gene therapies to specific targets in the body to treat genetic
problems.
Last but not least, plastic, reconstructive, and cosmetic
surgery could be replaced with cloning. For example, of human cloning and its
technology the days of silicone breast implants and other cosmetic procedures
that may cause immune disease should soon be over. With the new technology,
instead of using materials foreign to the body for such procedures, doctors
will be able to manufacture bone, fat, connective tissue, or cartilage that
matches the patients tissues exactly. Anyone will able to have their appearance
altered to their satisfaction without the leaking of silicone gel into their
bodies or the other problems that occur with present day plastic surgery.
Victims of terrible accidents that deform the face should now be able to have
their features repaired with new, safer, technology.
In the nutshell,Cloning offers remarkable insight into the power of creation that humanity has taken into its fold. One theological analysis holds that humans are co-creators with God; perhaps it is more accurate to say that humans are moving ever closer to a posture of making babies, rather than having babies. Cloning represents a remarkable test of human restraint, wisdom and institutional development, one that will in many ways identify the moral features of 21st century biotechnology.
WRITTEN BY,
FARZANA
No comments:
Post a Comment